by Bill Bonner and Addison Wiggin

Mr. James Surowiecki wrote a wise and moronic piece on gold in the New
Yorker. His wisdom is centered on the insight that neither gold, nor paper
money are true wealth, but only relative measures, subject to adjustment.

“Gold or not, we’re always just running on air,” he wrote. “You can’t be
rich unless everyone agrees you’re rich.”

In other words, there is no law that guarantees gold at $450 an ounce. It
might just as well be priced at $266 an ounce, as it was when George W.
Bush took office for the first time. Since then, a man who counted his
wealth in Kruggerands has become 70 percent richer.

But gold wasn’t born yesterday, or four years ago. Mr. Surowiecki noticed
that the metal has a past, just as it has a present. He turned his head
around and looked back a quarter of a century. The yellow metal was not a
great way to preserve wealth during that period, he notes. As a result, he
sees no difference between a paper dollar and a gold doubloon, or between
a bull market in gold and a bubble in technology shares.

“In the end, our trust in gold is no different from our trust in a piece
of paper with ‘one dollar’ written on it,” he believes. And when you buy
gold, “you’re buying into a collective hallucination-exactly what those
dot-com investors did in the late nineties.”

Pity he did not bother to look back a little further. This is the moronic
part. While Mr. Surowiecki looked at a bit of gold’s past, he did not see
enough of it. Both gold and paper dollars have histories, but gold has far
more. Both gold and dollars have a future. But, and this is the important
part, gold is likely to have more of that, too.

The expression, “as rich as Croesus,” is of ancient origin. The king of
historic Lydia is remembered, even today, for his great wealth. Croesus
was not rich because he had stacks of dollar bills. Instead, he measured
his richness in gold. No one says “as poor as Croesus.” We have also heard
the expression, “not worth a Continental,” referring to America’s paper
money during the Revolutionary War era. We have never heard the
expression, “not worth a Kruggerand.”

Likewise, when Jesus said, “Render unto Caesar that which is Caesar’s,” he
referred to a denarius, a coin of gold or silver, not a paper currency.
The coin had Caesar’s image on it, just as today’s American money has a
picture of Lincoln, Washington, or Jackson on it. Dead presidents were
golden back then. Even today, a gold denarius is still about as valuable
as it was when Caesar conquered Gaul. America’s dead presidents, whose
images are printed in green ink on special paper, lose 2 percent to 5
percent of their purchasing power every year. What do you think they will
be worth 2,000 years from now?

A few years before Jesus, Crassus, who had made his fortune on real estate
speculation in Rome, decided to put together an army to hustle the east.
Alas, such projects almost always meet with disaster; the attempt by
Crassus was no exception. He was captured by the Parthians and was put to
death in an unusually cruel and costly way. He did not end his days with
paper money stuffed down his throat, and certainly not dollar bills.

No, they poured molten gold down his gullet-or so the story has it. Gold
has a long history. And during its history, many was the time that humans
were tempted to replace it with other forms of money- which they believed
would be more convenient, more modern, and most importantly, more
accommodating. Gold is hard to find and hard to bring up out of the earth.
By its nature, the quantity of gold is always limited.

Paper money, by contrast, offers irresistible possibilities. The list of
bright paper rivals is long and colorful. You will find hundreds of
examples, from assignats to zlotys, and from imperial purple to beer suds
brown. But the story of paper money is short and predictable. Since the
invention of the printing press, a new paper dollar or franc can be
brought out at negligible cost. Nor does it cost much to increase the
money supply by a factor of 10 or 100-simply add zeros. It may seem
obvious, but adding zeros does not add value.

Still, the attraction of being able to get something for nothing has
always been too great to resist. That is what makes goldbugs so
irritating: They are always pointing it out. Even worse, they seem to
enjoy saying “There ain’t no such thing as a free lunch,” which comes as a
big disappointment to most people.

Once people were able to create money at virtually no expense, no one ever
resisted doing it to excess. No paper currency has ever held its value for
very long. Most are ruined within a few years. Some take longer.

Even the world’s two most successful paper currencies-the American dollar
and the British pound-have each lost more than 95 percent of their value
in the past century, which is especially remarkable since both were linked
by law and custom to gold for most of those years. For the dollar, the
final link to gold was severed only 34 years ago.

Some paper currencies are destroyed almost absentmindedly. Others are
ruined intentionally. But all go away eventually. By contrast, every gold
coin that was ever struck is still valuable today, most have more real
value than when they first came out of the mint.

Central bankers reported in early 2005 that 70 percent of them were
Increasing their reserves of euros. As for the world’s erstwhile and
present reserve currency, the dollar, they seemed to have, not growing
reserves, but growing reservations. We also have reservations about the
dollar. Whatever it is worth today or tomorrow, we are sure it will have
less worth eventually. That it is not regarded as worthless already is
remarkable. The average dollar is nothing more than electronic
information. It exists thanks only to the ability of digital technology to
keep track of it. Relatively few dollars ever make it to paper, and many
of them end up in the pockets of Russian drug dealers and African
politicians. Most dollars inmost people’s accounts are not even graced
with the image of a dead president; when the end comes, they won’t even be
useful for starting fires.

It is imperial vanity that keeps the dollar in business. And it is vanity
that will make it worthless. Economists want money they can control.

Central bankers want money they can debase. And politicians want money
they might get their mug on. The trouble with gold is that it turns its
back on world improvers, empire builders, and do-gooders. It is money that
no central bank promotes and none destroys. It is money that exists only
in a tangible form, a real metal-a number on the periodic table.

“Gold goes up and down, just like other kinds of money,” say economists.
Which is true. “You can protect yourself from inflation in other ways,”
say the speculators. True again.

“Gold pays no dividends or interest,” say the investors. True.

Nor will gold cure baldness or add inches to your most private part. Even
as money, gold may not be perfect. But it is better money than anything
else. Gold was around millions of years before the U.S. dollar was
invented. It will probably be around a billion years after. This longevity
is not in itself a great recommendation. It is like buying a suit that
will last longer than you do; there is no point to it. But the reason for
gold’s longevity is also the reason for its great virtue as money: It is
inert; it yields neither to technology nor to vanity.

The world improvers will always be with us. They will spend more than they
have, boss other people around, and generally make the world a worse place
to live. They will offer proposals like those of Thomas L. Friedman. The
nice thing about gold is that it is so unresponsive. It neither laughs nor
applauds. Gold is money that no central bank promotes and none destroys.

Paper money is a handy tool for the world improvers. They use it like
politicians use civil service jobs and generals use heavy bombers-to get
their way. Whatever the vapid ideal du jour, it takes money to pursue it.
Given enough money, the poor can be fed and housed. The middle classes can
be given free medical care and low-cost loans for houses. The upper
classes can be given contracts and favors. Enemies can be summoned up,
bombed, and reconstructed. Bread, circuses, war-the imperial program costs

How to get more money for these great new programs, these marvelously
worthwhile ideals, these fabulous public spectacles? Gold flatly refuses
to cooperate. It doesn’t even give a reason. Instead, it stays as mute and
reticent as a dead man in front of a television. No matter how persuasive
the advertising, the man is not going to go for it.

Paper money, on the other hand, barely needs encouragement. Start up the
presses! Lower the interest rate! Relax reserve requirements and lending
standards! Sell more bonds! Create more paper! Paper money is ready to go
along with anything. Like George W. Bush, it never met a boondoggle it
didn’t like. Sooner or later, it ends up as worthless as the projects it
was meant to pay for.

Gold is merely the subversive investor’s way of protecting himself.


Bill Bonner and Addison Wiggin
for The Daily Reckoning

Editor’s Note: Bill Bonner is the founder and editor of The Daily
Reckoning. He is also the author, with Addison Wiggin, of The Wall Street
Journal best seller Financial Reckoning Day: Surviving the Soft Depression
of the 21st Century (John Wiley & Sons).

In Bonner and Wiggin’s follow-up book, Empire of Debt: The Rise of an Epic
Financial Crisis, they wield their sardonic brand of humor to expose the
nation for what it really is – an empire built on delusions. Daily
Reckoning readers can buy their copy of Empire of Debt – now available in
paperback – just click on the link below:

The Most Feared Book in Washington!